byFarjana Basir Content Writer
CUET PG Marks vs Percentile: Every year CUET PG scorecard gets released. The marks obtained in your scorecard determine your CUET PG percentile. CUET PG marks are the scores you obtain in your examination whereas the percentile shows your performance compared to other candidates.
You can calculate your percentile with your marks. It makes it easier for you to aim for a particular college. CUET PG marks above 200 can get you a percentile between 70 to 90 depending on your subject. You can check the list of CUET PG 2024 toppers below to know the highest marks in each subject.
This year, CUET PG counselling will take place by the participating universities individually and you will have to apply for the desired college/university based on your marks and percentile. CUET PG results have been released on April 13, 2024.
The selection and admission would be subject to fulfilling the admission criteria, eligibility, rank in merit list, medical fitness, verification of original documents and such other criteria as may be prescribed by the University the candidate is applying for.
Must Check:
CUET PG Marks vs Percentile
| CUET PG Total Marks | CUET PG Expected Percentile |
|---|---|
| 270-300 | 100 |
| 230-270 | 88-99 |
| 170-220 | 66-77 |
| 100-169 | 55-65 |
| 50-99 | 30-40 |
| <50 | <25 |
What are NTA Scores in CUET PG 2024 Result?
Some CUET PG examinations that are held in multiple shifts have a different question paper to avoid any cheating. Now that the same subject students give different papers, some might have attempted difficult papers than others. Therefore, to solve this issue, marks secured by students are merged and evaluated. These final evaluated marks are called NTA Scores. This is how every student gets fair marks based on their performance and irrespective of difficulty of paper in various shifts.
CUET PG Results 2024
CUET PG results have been out on the official website- pgcuet.samarth.ac.in. You can download your CUET PG 2024 scorecard by logging into the official portal using your credentials- application number and password/ date of birth.
CUET PG 2024 Marks vs Percentile- Toppers List (Out)
| Paper Code | Topper Name | CUET PG Marks (Out of 300) |
|---|---|---|
| ACQP01 | Nainsi jain | 217 |
| ACQP02 | Tek Chand Sharma | 225 |
| ACQP03 | DWIJENDRA KUMAR DUBEY | 153 |
| ACQP04 | Jitan Devi | 225 |
| ACQP05 | SHYAM SUNDAR PANDA | 215 |
| ACQP06 | YATI TIWARI | 110 |
| ACQP07 | Anshuman Mishra | 285 |
| ACQP08 | Shubham Shandilya | 291 |
| ACQP09 | AYUSH KUMAR SINGH | 225 |
| ACQP10 | PREKSHA JAIN | 287 |
| ACQP11 | Sidharth Pandey | 255 |
| ACQP12 | Himanshu Jha | 210 |
| ACQP13 | CHUMKI SAA | 100 |
| ACQP14 | PRADEEP POUDEL | 270 |
| ACQP15 | Himanshu Jha | 230 |
| ACQP16 | SANGITA PRIYADARSHINI SWAIN | 225 |
| ACQP17 | HIMANSHU KUMAR UPADHYAY | 120 |
| ACQP18 | SUBRAT KUMAR DASH | 283 |
| ACQP19 | DRASHTI JAIN | 255 |
| ACQP20 | SHUBHAM TIWARI | 97 |
| ACQP21 | Divyansh Krishna Sharma | 227 |
| ACQP22 | Kanhaiya lal dewangan | 174 |
| ACQP23 | SHRIKANTH IRAPPA BANDI | 245 |
| ACQP24 | Sunit Adhikary | 201 |
| ACQP25 | BASANTARAJ SUBEDI | 285 |
| ACQP26 | MADHU MAHABALESHWARA HEGDE | 225 |
| COQP01 | SHUBHAM JYOTI SAHOO | 228 |
| COQP02 | Garima Singh | 214 |
| COQP03 | Dev Vandana | 187 |
| COQP04 | Khushi Todwal | 198 |
| COQP05 | KARTIK VATS | 259 |
| COQP06 | Chahat Pathak | 240 |
| COQP07 | SURJYATAPO BASU | 243 |
| COQP08 | Rachit Agrawal | 207 |
| COQP09 | vishal patel | 148 |
| COQP10 | MIHIR DEV CHOUDHARY | 282 |
| COQP11 | Yash Dabas | 285 |
| COQP12 | HITESH SHARMA | 295 |
| COQP13 | RONAK JAIN | 238 |
| COQP14 | Pratham Mohan Sharma | 240 |
| COQP15 | Arya Tiwari | 225 |
| COQP16 | Neeraj Singh | 255 |
| COQP17 | Aafrren Chaudhry | 296 |
| COQP18 | MOHD RAIHAN | 250 |
| COQP19 | Siddharth R | 240 |
| COQP20 | Pranav K A | 180 |
| COQP21 | PRIYANKA | 238 |
| COQP22 | ASHTAMOORTHY E M | 155 |
| HUQP01 | SRISHTI SINGH | 227 |
| HUQP02 | Saikrishna Badatya | 252 |
| HUQP03 | KRITI MADAN | 249 |
| HUQP04 | Surjavo Sen Gupta | 185 |
| HUQP05 | Pranati Goturi | 259 |
| HUQP06 | Ashwin Patidar | 255 |
| HUQP07 | SHIVENDRA PRATAP YADAV | 216 |
| HUQP08 | Garima Singh | 247 |
| HUQP09 | Venkat Adarsh | 232 |
| HUQP10 | SUMEDHA BHOWMICK | 226 |
| HUQP11 | TAPDIYA RUTUJA VIJAYKUMAR | 157 |
| HUQP12 | ANAGHA M NAMBISAN | 253 |
| HUQP13 | PRAKHYATI SHARMA | 197 |
| HUQP14 | Raksha Tripathi | 287 |
| HUQP15 | Aritra Dey | 270 |
| HUQP16 | Prabhat Kumar | 248 |
| HUQP17 | GURU SRAVAN KUMAR | 205 |
| HUQP18 | Pratyush Tiwari | 270 |
| HUQP19 | Utkarsha Mahato | 234 |
| HUQP20 | Ananya Srikkant | 300 |
| HUQP21 | PRATIK ROYCHAUDHURY | 250 |
| HUQP22 | Aanya Sharma | 290 |
| HUQP23 | Nikita Nagar | 161 |
| HUQP24 | Joshi Gandhar Gopalkrishna | 160 |
| HUQP25 | Santosh Kumar Chaudhary | 275 |
| HUQP26 | RISHIT DATTA | 123 |
| LAQP01 | Milee Jangid | 225 |
| LAQP02 | Amarpali Sagar | 271 |
| LAQP03 | BHASKAR TIWARI | 282 |
| LAQP04 | UZMA JUNAID | 260 |
| LAQP05 | Waheeduzzama | 290 |
| LAQP06 | Swapnam Jyoti Kolita | 209 |
| LAQP07 | USHASI SAHA | 239 |
| LAQP08 | TSHERING PINTSO BHUTIA | 165 |
| LAQP09 | Ankit Bera | 138 |
| LAQP10 | SAMRIDHI BHATT | 231 |
| LAQP11 | Kuinbirth N Arengh | 200 |
| LAQP12 | Vartika Shahi | 236 |
| LAQP13 | VASAVA RAVINABEN | 210 |
| LAQP14 | Mohd Muzammil | 232 |
| LAQP15 | Rudra Pratap | 192 |
| LAQP16 | KUNTABASAPPARA NAGARAJA | 235 |
| LAQP17 | SHABNUM BANO | 120 |
| LAQP18 | SAMBORLANG PDE | 240 |
| LAQP19 | KANAN DEBBARMA | 171 |
| LAQP20 | LAYA BUCHA | 195 |
| LAQP21 | Pem Choden Lepcha | 243 |
| LAQP22 | Budha Rani Limboo | 173 |
| LAQP23 | SUDHINA CHANDRAN V | 207 |
| LAQP24 | JOYSHREE TOIJAM | 152 |
| LAQP25 | Seema Gautam Bansode | 199 |
| LAQP26 | MONDIRA RAWAT | 148 |
| LAQP27 | PURUSOTTAM SAHU | 276 |
| LAQP28 | RAM PAL | 242 |
| LAQP29 | Tarlok Kaur | 119 |
| LAQP30 | Mohd Hamza | 215 |
| LAQP31 | GANGA SINGH SHEKHAWAT | 120 |
| LAQP32 | SURESH DAN | 195 |
| LAQP33 | Daya Singh | 175 |
| LAQP34 | Dushyant Hetta | 215 |
| LAQP35 | VARUN KUMAR S | 255 |
| LAQP36 | MADDELA MURALI | 190 |
| LAQP37 | MOHAMMAD SAQUIB | 286 |
| LAQP38 | MAHFOOZUR RAHMAN | 190 |
| LAQP39 | Passang Dorjee Sherpa | 215 |
| LAQP40 | UJJAL MURMU | 134 |
| LAQP41 | LAKSHITA MALIK | 134 |
| MTQP01 | S Logeshwarar | 115 |
| MTQP02 | Rajat Singh | 180 |
| MTQP03 | Sanjay Babu C | 186 |
| MTQP04 | Yogesh Joshi | 207 |
| MTQP05 | YARRU LAKSHMI SAI KRISHNA | 185 |
| MTQP06 | Komakshi Saini | 210 |
| MTQP07 | Anurag Tripathi | 110 |
| MTQP08 | RINKU NAYAK | 120 |
| MTQP09 | Istkhar Khan | 140 |
| MTQP10 | Shashank bhadouria | 163 |
| MTQP11 | Rishabh Dev Tripathi | 171 |
| MTQP12 | Aradhya Tiwari | 65 |
| SCQP01 | Nidhi Bishnoi | 268 |
| SCQP02 | Shashank M | 168 |
| SCQP03 | Karthik Prashant | 281 |
| SCQP04 | JOSYULA LAKSHMI PRATYUSHA | 145 |
| SCQP05 | Siddhant Bhardwaj | 243 |
| SCQP06 | Joyeeta Bhattacharya | 160 |
| SCQP07 | Prerna | 207 |
| SCQP08 | Fidha Vadakke Thodikayil | 257 |
| SCQP09 | DHRUV SINGLA | 252 |
| SCQP10 | SHWETA | 230 |
| SCQP11 | Soumya Rout | 184 |
| SCQP12 | Arpita Pant | 190 |
| SCQP13 | SHUBHAM PATWA | 254 |
| SCQP14 | PARTHA PRATIM SAHA | 277 |
| SCQP15 | ROHIT KUMAR VERMA | 186 |
| SCQP16 | Parna Chatterjee | 228 |
| SCQP17 | Muhafiz Ali | 241 |
| SCQP18 | Rohneesh Sachan | 161 |
| SCQP19 | Ashutosh Sharma | 265 |
| SCQP20 | Ankur Sharma | 189 |
| SCQP21 | GARGI UNTAWALE | 195 |
| SCQP22 | Ariba | 173 |
| SCQP23 | Gangawane Vishal Sachin | 191 |
| SCQP24 | INDUREKHA KUNDU | 246 |
| SCQP25 | ANUSHKA DEVI | 267 |
| SCQP26 | HARSHIT KUMAR GUPTA | 184 |
| SCQP27 | Bishwayan Ghosh | 232 |
| SCQP28 | DIVYANSHU BHATT | 208 |
| SCQP29 | GANESH BASHWARA V | 154 |
| SCQP30 | PARVEEN KUMAR | 133 |
What is a Good Score in CUET PG 2024?
CUET PG exam pattern has changed and now there are a total of 75 questions asked of 4 marks each. Negative marking also impacts your final scores. Considering all that changes in exam pattern and negative marking, marks over 200 can be a good score in CUET PG.
CUET PG total marks are 300 for each subject, therefore 200+ marks can get you to 75-100 percentile. 270+ marks may get 100 percentile. Check CUET PG Question Paper 2024
CUET PG Cut off 2024
| College | Course | General | OBC | SC | ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DU | MSc Mathematics | 185-205 | 175-195 | 165-185 | 155-175 |
| M.Com | 190-210 | 180-200 | 170-190 | 160-180 | |
| M.A Economics | 100-130 | 70-90 | 50-80 | 40-70 | |
| BHU | M.Sc Chemistry | 200-220 | 180-200 | 140-150 | - |
| M.Sc Statistics | 230-250 | 200-210 | 180-190 | - | |
| MCA | 270-280 | 250-260 | 190-210 | - |
Check CUET PG 2024 Cutoff
CUET PG College Predictor
CUET PG College Predictor is a tool exclusively designed for you to help you predict your desired college. Our college predictor tool predicts the college based on your expected marks obtained in the examination. We have over 142+ colleges and universities prediction with 97% accuracy. Our Collegedunia College predictor tool is free to use. You just need to enter your expected score, course and category and submit to see the results.
Quick Links:
Frequently Asked Questions
Ques. How many candidates appeared for CUET PG 2024?
Ans. 768414 candidates registered for CUET PG 2024. The competition is rising with the high number of registered candidates. Out of total candidates, 353044 are male candidates. 415300 and 20 candidates are Females and Third gender respectively.
Ques. What is the benefit of marks vs percentile?
Ans. Marks vs percentile helps you to have an idea about how much you need to score in CUET PG to get the particular percentile. Percentile can be calculated with the expected marks obtained in the examination. Therefore, CUET PG marks vs percentile benefit in predicting the rank and preferred college.
Ques. Can I get my marks re-evaluated for CUET PG 2024?
Ans. No, there will be no re-evaluation of marks in CUET PG 2024. However, you can challenge an answer of your doubt. If you get it right, marks will be given for that question and the final score card will be released. No further grievance regarding the final answer key will be accepted.
Ques. What is normalisation of marks in CUET PG?
Ans. Previously, In CUET PG, sometimes one subject exam took place in multiple shifts or days. So, students had to solve different difficulty level papers for the same subject. Therefore, to have a fair evaluation, normalisation of scores is done in which all the scores are put on the same scale.
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, which will be updated soon subject to the notification issued by the University/College.
Comments