GRE 2024 Verbal Reasoning Test 8 Question Paper with Solutions PDF

N/A Quick Tip: Focus on identifying concerns or challenges explicitly mentioned in the passage to select the correct option.

N/A Quick Tip: Identify specific problems or challenges mentioned in the passage to select the correct answer.

N/A Quick Tip: When answering, focus on both benefits and drawbacks mentioned explicitly to distinguish correct options.

N/A Quick Tip: Always connect your answer to explicit challenges mentioned in the passage for accuracy.

N/A Quick Tip: Focus on contrasting benefits and limitations in the passage to pinpoint the correct answer.

N/A Quick Tip: Look for explicit challenges or drawbacks mentioned in the passage to select the best answer.

N/A Quick Tip: In sentence completion questions with contrasting clauses, look for words that create a clear opposition or difference in attitude.

N/A Quick Tip: Look for conjunctions like “yet” or “but” to identify contrasting sentiments for the blanks.

N/A Quick Tip: In sentences with contrasting views, use positive words for approval and negative words for disapproval in the respective blanks.

N/A

N/A Quick Tip: Look for contrast words like “despite” to help identify opposing ideas for the blanks.

N/A Quick Tip: Focus on the overall tone of the sentence—words like “eager to delve deeper” indicate a positive, engaging experience.

N/A Quick Tip: When answering questions based on a passage, focus on explicit concerns or challenges mentioned by the author to identify the correct response.

N/A Quick Tip: When answering questions about scientific phenomena, pay attention to the methods or evidence scientists use to support their theories, especially when direct observation is not possible.

N/A Quick Tip: When evaluating technological challenges, focus on limitations or issues explicitly mentioned, such as performance constraints or resource demands.

N/A Quick Tip: Focus on key terms in the passage that describe positive effects or benefits when answering questions on scientific concepts.

N/A Quick Tip: When evaluating challenges in scientific or technical contexts, focus on any limitations or hurdles explicitly mentioned by the author.

N/A Quick Tip: When answering questions about ethical concerns, look for mentions of societal impact, privacy, fairness, or employment issues.

N/A Quick Tip: Focus on cause-and-effect relationships in passages about environmental issues to identify accurate consequences or impacts.

N/A Quick Tip: When analyzing passages about technology applications, pay attention to both the advantages and the obstacles discussed to correctly identify challenges.

The sentence is structured to present two contrasting reactions to the politician’s speech. The word "yet" in the middle indicates a contrast, which should guide our choice of words. Let's break it down:


First Blank: "The politician’s speech was \underline{\hspace{3cm for its inspirational message."

The phrase "inspirational message" suggests a positive quality. We are looking for a word that conveys approval or admiration.
Among the options, (C) praised fits perfectly because it means the speech was highly regarded or acknowledged for its positive impact.
Option (A) celebrated could also be a reasonable choice, but "celebrated" tends to imply more of a public event or occasion, whereas "praised" directly emphasizes positive feedback, which fits the context better.


Second Blank: "Yet it was also \underline{\hspace{3cm for its lack of concrete policy proposals."

The second half of the sentence introduces a criticism—the "lack of concrete policy proposals" implies a negative aspect of the speech.
We are therefore looking for a word that conveys disapproval or critique.
Option (D) criticized fits this context as it means the speech was negatively reviewed or pointed out for its shortcomings.
Other options like (E) condemned are too strong in this context. "Condemned" implies a much harsher judgment, whereas "criticized" more moderately fits the idea of pointing out a flaw without extreme condemnation.



Therefore, the most appropriate choice is (C) praised for the first blank and (D) criticized for the second blank, as they convey the contrasting positive and negative reactions to the speech. Quick Tip: In sentence completion questions, pay close attention to conjunctions like "yet," which signal contrasting ideas. This can help you choose words that reflect opposing views.

This sentence presents a contrast between two perspectives — the **consumers** and the **experts** — as indicated by the word **"but."** This implies that the two blanks should represent opposing or differing sentiments.


First Blank: "The new product launch was \underline{\hspace{3cm by consumers for its innovative design."

The phrase "innovative design" suggests a positive trait appreciated by consumers.
We are looking for a positive word that means "praised" or "highly appreciated."
(A) lauded means to praise or extol, which fits perfectly in this context.
Options like (C) celebrated and (E) embraced are also positive, but “lauded” directly captures the idea of verbal praise, which matches the tone of consumer admiration.


Second Blank: "but it was \underline{\hspace{3cm by experts who doubted its practicality."

Here, the experts are not impressed — they "doubted its practicality," which implies skepticism, not outright condemnation.
So, the word should reflect mild criticism or doubt rather than harsh negativity.
(F) questioned fits best, as it implies the experts had concerns or were unsure about its real-world utility.
Option (D) condemned would be too strong — it implies strong disapproval or moral denunciation, which doesn't match the context of technical or practical skepticism.



Therefore, the best choices are (A) lauded and (F) questioned, which reflect the contrast between public praise and expert doubt. Quick Tip: When you see conjunctions like "but," expect a shift or contrast in tone. Align each blank with the sentiment (positive or negative) of its corresponding clause.

This sentence presents two contrasting opinions about the author's novel — one from **readers** and one from **critics**, indicated by the conjunction **"yet"**. This signals that we should expect opposing tones in the two blanks: one positive, the other negative.


First Blank: "The author’s novel was \underline{\hspace{3cm by readers for its engaging plot."

The phrase "engaging plot" has a clearly positive connotation, so we need a word that reflects praise or appreciation from readers.
(A) praised fits this context well, as it directly conveys approval and admiration.
(C) celebrated could also work, but “praised” is more straightforward and common when referring to literary feedback.


Second Blank: "yet it was \underline{\hspace{3cm by critics for its predictable ending."

The clause "predictable ending" introduces a flaw, and since it's the opinion of critics, we expect a negative response.
(D) criticized is the most appropriate choice, as it directly describes how critics typically respond to literary shortcomings.
Options like (B) condemned are too extreme in this literary context, and (F) questioned implies doubt rather than critique. (E) overlooked doesn’t fit the sentence structure — critics didn’t ignore the book; they took issue with it.



Thus, the correct answer is (A) praised and (D) criticized, reflecting the contrast between readers' admiration and critics' disappointment. Quick Tip: Look for conjunctions like "yet" or "but" — they signal a shift in tone or opinion. Use that contrast to guide your word choices for each blank.

This sentence describes a decision that received **mixed reactions** — a **positive** response from residents and a **negative** one from developers. The conjunction **"but"** highlights this contrast and helps guide the tone needed for each blank.


First Blank: "The city’s decision to build more parks was \underline{\hspace{3cm by residents for improving quality of life."

The phrase "improving quality of life" suggests a benefit and thus a **positive reaction** from residents.
(A) applauded fits well because it means praised or approved enthusiastically.
(B) supported and (E) embraced are also positive, but "applauded" best conveys an active, public appreciation, making it the most fitting.


Second Blank: "but it was \underline{\hspace{3cm by developers who saw it as a misuse of valuable land."

Developers see the land use as inefficient — indicating a **negative reaction**.
(C) opposed is the best choice, meaning they were against the decision.
(F) denounced could also work but is a much stronger term, implying moral outrage or harsh public condemnation — which may be too intense for a disagreement over urban planning.



Thus, the correct answer is (A) applauded and (C) opposed, capturing the contrast in public sentiment toward the city's decision. Quick Tip: Pay attention to who is reacting and why. Residents and developers often have conflicting interests — use logic and tone to pick the best fit.

This sentence highlights the impact of a professor’s lecture, which **left students eager to learn more**. That suggests a **positive**, intellectually engaging experience. Let’s analyze:


The key phrase is: "left the students both [blank] and eager to delve deeper", indicating that the students were **positively affected**, possibly inspired or intellectually stimulated.
The correct words should reflect this intellectual awakening or clarity.


Analysis of the options:


(A) baffling – means confusing or puzzling. This has a negative tone and contradicts the idea of students being eager to explore more. \texttimes
(B) enlightening – means providing insight or knowledge. It fits perfectly. \checkmark
(C) confusing – similar to "baffling", and again contradicts the positive effect. \texttimes
(D) illuminating – means clarifying or shedding light on a topic. Also very appropriate. \checkmark
(E) inscrutable – means impossible to understand. Another negative term. \texttimes
(F) stimulating – although this could work, it doesn’t match as well with the structure "left the students both [blank] and eager..." since "stimulating" is more about sparking interest than providing understanding. It’s close but not the best fit.


Conclusion: The two words that best convey a clear, impactful lecture are (B) enlightening and (D) illuminating. Quick Tip: When choosing multiple answers, make sure both fit the sentence logically and reinforce each other in tone and meaning. Redundancy (as in synonyms) is often intentional in such questions.

The sentence describes a protagonist who is both "engaging" and able to "capture readers’ attention from start to finish". This clearly indicates that the correct choices should be **positive in tone**, highlighting the character’s appeal and impact.

Step-by-step analysis:


The adjectives used must match the idea of a character who is interesting, active, and appealing to the reader.
(A) dynamic – means energetic, changing, and full of life. This fits well for a protagonist who engages the audience. \checkmark
(E) compelling – means evoking interest, attention, or admiration in a powerfully irresistible way. This also fits perfectly. \checkmark


Why the other choices are incorrect:


(B) bland – dull, lacking strong features. Opposite of "engaging." \texttimes
(C) inspiring – positive, but focuses more on motivation or moral uplift, which is not directly supported by the context. \texttimes
(D) mundane – ordinary or dull. Doesn’t fit with a character who captures attention. \texttimes
(F) ordinary – average or unremarkable. Again, inconsistent with the "engaging" description. \texttimes


Conclusion: The two choices that best reflect an engaging and captivating protagonist are (A) dynamic and (E) compelling. Quick Tip: Look for strong positive or negative cues in the sentence. Words like "engaging" and "capturing attention" clearly call for dynamic and powerful descriptors.

The sentence discusses a startup's approach that is seen as both "risky" and another (positive or neutral) quality. The blank must capture a strategy that is unconventional or daring — something that could attract attention but also raise concerns.


Clue: The phrase "risky by potential investors" suggests that the approach was \textit{unusual, ambitious, or forward-thinking — not safe or cautious.


Option analysis:


(B) innovative – means creative, new, or groundbreaking. This fits perfectly for a startup challenging the status quo. \checkmark
(D) bold – means courageous, daring, or willing to take risks. This aligns well with the mention of risk. \checkmark


Why the other options are incorrect:


(A) conventional – the opposite of innovative. Conventional methods are standard and would not be considered risky. \texttimes

(C) cautious – careful or risk-averse, contradicts the idea of being seen as "risky." \texttimes
(E) timid – shy or lacking courage; again, does not fit with a risky or daring image. \texttimes
(F) visionary – could be appropriate in some contexts, but it emphasizes long-term insight, not risk-taking or boldness directly. \texttimes


Conclusion: The words that best convey an approach that is fresh and daring (but therefore risky) are (B) innovative and (D) bold. Quick Tip: Look for words in the sentence like "risky" or "ambitious" — these help you eliminate options that suggest safety, caution, or tradition.