GRE 2024 Verbal Reasoning Test 1 Question Paper with Solutions PDF

Step 1: Context: Alfred’s relief suggests the professor’s reaction was positive.

Step 2: Options: Gainsaid (denied), Denigrated (criticized), Ignored (overlooked),

Corroborated (confirmed), Derided (mocked).

Step 3: Corroborated fits as it means the professor confirmed Alfred’s guess.

Step 4: Others imply negative or neutral reactions, clashing with relief. Quick Tip: Match word to positive outcome.

Step 1: Context: Sam’s extensive knowledge includes arcane (obscure) details.

Step 2: Options: Quizzical (puzzling), Astute (shrewd), Tedious (boring), Recondite

(obscure), Mystical (mysterious).

Step 3: Recondite fits as it means obscure, matching arcane details.

Step 4: Others don’t align with arcane context. Quick Tip: Match word to obscure details.

Step 1: Context: Harsh rulers giving something frequently to the condemned.

Step 2: Options: Clemency (mercy), Adulation (praise), Ephemera (short-lived things),

Philanthropy (charity), Nostalgia (sentimentality).

Step 3: Clemency fits as mercy to the condemned contrasts their harshness.

Step 4: Others don’t apply to condemned context. Quick Tip: Match word to mercy for condemned.

Step 1: Context: Hating unnecessary aesthetic details implies functional focus.

Step 2: Options: Lavish (luxurious), Malicious (spiteful), Utilitarian (practical),

Ominous (threatening), Benign (harmless).

Step 3: Utilitarian fits as it means designed for utility, not aesthetics.

Step 4: Others don’t match functional intent. Quick Tip: Match word to functional design.

Step 1: Context: Girl disobeys elders from birth, implying stubborn behavior.

Step 2: Options: Wilful (stubborn), Refractory (unmanageable), Childish (immature),

Vexing (annoying), Unflinching (resolute); Insights (understanding), Injunctions (orders),

Recommendations (suggestions), Tedium (boredom), Sagacity (wisdom).

Step 3: Refractory (hard to control) and Injunctions (commands) fit disobedience.

Step 4: Others mismatch behavior or elder’s role. Quick Tip: Match stubbornness and authoritative orders.

Step 1: Context: Paschal addresses difficult topics directly, unafraid of upsetting friends.

Step 2: Options: Circumlocute (talk indirectly), Defer (postpone), Lie (falsify),

Dissimulate (conceal), Dramatize (exaggerate); Disconcerting (unsettling), Vexing (annoying),

Boring (dull), Emending (correcting), Angering (enraging).

Step 3: Circumlocute (avoiding directness) and Disconcerting (causing unease) fit.

Step 4: Others don’t match directness or unsettling effect. Quick Tip: Match directness with unsettling impact.

Step 1: Context: Suzanne trusts liars and falls for scoundrels, implying naivety.

Step 2: Options: Mendacious (dishonest), Fulminating (explosive), Loquacious (talkative),

Notable (famous), Repentant (regretful); Ingenuous (naive), Placid (calm), Rapt (absorbed),

Forgiving (lenient), Charitable (generous).

Step 3: Mendacious (lying) and Ingenuous (trusting) fit her vulnerability.

Step 4: Others mismatch liar trait or personality. Quick Tip: Match liar trait with naive personality.

Step 1: Context: He uses few words, sister uses many cheerfully on trivial topics.

Step 2: Options: Terse (concise), Laconic (brief), Lithe (flexible), Enigmatic (mysterious),

Hedonistic (pleasure-seeking); Verbose (wordy), Loquacious (talkative), Boorish (rude),

Ponderous (heavy), Ascetic (self-denying); Harangue (rant), Prattle (chat idly), Lampoon

(satire), Chatter (talk), Abstain (refrain).

Step 3: Laconic (using few words), Loquacious (talkative), Prattle (idle chatter) fit.

Step 4: Others mismatch brevity, talkativeness, or cheerful tone. Quick Tip: Match brevity with talkative idle chat.

Step 1: Context: Corporal’s surprise action contrasts normal behavior, criticizing a hasty order.

Step 2: Options: Garrulous (talkative), Taciturn (quiet), Laconic (brief), Obsequious

(servile), Reticent (reserved); Sagacity (wisdom), Audacity (boldness), Presumption

(arrogance), Volatility (unpredictability), Dogmatism (assertiveness); Meticulous

(careful), Impetuous (rash), Pragmatic (practical), Banal (trite), Sanctioned (approved).

Step 3: Taciturn (quiet) fits her norm, Audacity (boldness) her action, Impetuous

(rash) the order’s haste.

Step 4: Others mismatch traits or order description. Quick Tip: Match quiet norm, bold action, and rash order.

Step 1: Context: Theories lacked evidence initially, later supported, leading to recognition.

Step 2: Options: Tenuous (weak), Empirical (evidence-based), Spurious (false), Esoteric

(obscure), Ambiguous (unclear); Corroborated (confirmed), Bolstered (supported),

Enervated (weakened), Disparaged (criticized), Vindicated (justified); Accolades (praise),

Panegyrics (eulogies), Encomiums (tributes), Harangues (tirades), Elegy (lament).

Step 3: Tenuous (weak due to lack of evidence), Corroborated (later confirmed),

Accolades (awards) fit the progression.

Step 4: Others mismatch initial weakness, support, or recognition. Quick Tip: Match weak start, confirmation, and praise.

Step 1: Context: Small savings grow remarkably over time.

Step 2: Options: Abscission (cutting off), Liquidity (availability of cash), Accretion

(gradual accumulation), Tenacity (persistence), Dearth (scarcity).

Step 3: Accretion fits as it means the gradual buildup of funds.

Step 4: Others don’t imply growth or accumulation. Quick Tip: Match word to gradual growth.

Step 1: Context: Dog’s fear of water complicates bathing.

Step 2: Options: Rudimentary (basic), Simple (easy), Straightforward (clear),

Negligible (minor), Onerous (burdensome).

Step 3: Onerous fits as it means difficult or burdensome due to the fear.

Step 4: Others suggest ease, clashing with the complication. Quick Tip: Match word to difficulty caused by fear.

Step 1: Context: Theorem’s complexity prevents undergraduate understanding.

Step 2: Options: Loquacious (talkative), Erudite (scholarly), Ambiguous (unclear),

Lucid (clear), Esoteric (obscure).

Step 3: Esoteric fits as it means understood by few, explaining the difficulty.

Step 4: Others don’t imply inaccessibility to beginners. Quick Tip: Match word to obscure complexity.

Step 1: Context: Dave’s seriousness leads to explaining jokes, normally unspoken.

Step 2: Options: Viscous (thick), Pusillanimous (timid), Facetious (joking), Filial (familial),

Sportive (playful); Querulous (complaining), Pithy (concise), Tacit (unspoken), Luminous

(bright), Austere (severe).

Step 3: Facetious (humorous) comments and Tacit (implied) jokes fit his reaction.

Step 4: Others don’t match joke context or unspoken nature. Quick Tip: Match joking comments with unspoken jokes.

Step 1: Context: Suzy expected wasteful behavior, but Kevin was not a spendthrift.

Step 2: Options: Salubrious (healthy), Perfidious (treacherous), Profligate (wasteful),

Abstemious (moderate), Prodigal (extravagant); Prudence (caution), Reticence (silence),

Piety (devotion), Dissipation (waste), Frugality (thrift).

Step 3: Prodigal (wasteful) fits her expectation, Frugality (thrift) contrasts spendthrift.

Step 4: Others mismatch expectation or thrift. Quick Tip: Match expected waste with actual thrift.

Step 1: Context: Young and naïve pursue unachievable schemes.

Step 2: Options: Foolish (lacking judgment), Idiotic (stupid), Energetic (active),

Quixotic (unrealistically optimistic), Bright-eyed (eager); Incredible (unbelievable),

Impossible (unfeasible), Humanitarian (compassionate), Grandeur (magnificence),

Optimistic (hopeful).

Step 3: Quixotic (impractically idealistic) and Grandeur (grand plans) fit naivety.

Step 4: Others don’t capture idealistic unachievability. Quick Tip: Match naïve idealism with grand but unfeasible plans.

Step 1: Context: Butler’s distracted work due to overhearing an early scandal.

Step 2: Options: Hackneyed (overused), Perfunctory (cursory), Desultory (random),

Pervasive (widespread), Sordid (dirty); Implacable (unrelenting), Nascent (emerging),

Resolute (determined), Aggrandized (exaggerated), Boisterous (noisy).

Step 3: Perfunctory (done with little care) and Nascent (just beginning) fit distraction.

Step 4: Others mismatch task focus or scandal stage. Quick Tip: Match distracted work with early scandal.

Step 1: Context: Butler’s distracted work due to overhearing an early scandal.

Step 2: Options: Hackneyed (overused), Perfunctory (cursory), Desultory (random),

Pervasive (widespread), Sordid (dirty); Implacable (unrelenting), Nascent (emerging),

Resolute (determined), Aggrandized (exaggerated), Boisterous (noisy).

Step 3: Perfunctory (done with little care) and Nascent (just beginning) fit distraction.

Step 4: Others mismatch task focus or scandal stage. Quick Tip: Match distracted work with early scandal.

Step 1: Context: Editor shortens verbose introduction by removing excess.

Step 2: Options: Officious (meddlesome), Tortuous (twisted/complex), Immutable

(unchanging), Turgid (swollen/verbose), Florid (ornate); Sedulous (diligent), Succinct

(concise), Intransigent (unyielding), Concise (brief), Trenchant (sharp); Bolstering

(supporting), Excising (cutting out), Inhibiting (restraining), Qualifying (modifying),

Expiating (atoning).

Step 3: Tortuous (complex) pages to Succinct (brief) paragraphs by Excising (removing) fits.

Step 4: Others mismatch length or action. Quick Tip: Match complex to concise with cutting action.

Step 1: Context: Cat resists leash, dog obeys without correction.

Step 2: Options: Credulous (gullible), Obstreperous (noisy), Truculent (aggressive),

Recalcitrant (stubborn), Pernicious (harmful); Insipid (dull), Dogmatic (assertive),

Complaisant (agreeable), Tractable (manageable), Prodigal (wasteful); Aggrandized

(exalted), Countenanced (tolerated), Impeded (hindered), Admonished (reprimanded),

Flouted (disregarded).

Step 3: Recalcitrant (resistant) cat, Tractable (obedient) dog, Admonished (scolded) fits.

Step 4: Others mismatch behavior or correction. Quick Tip: Match resistant cat, obedient dog, and no scolding.

Step 1: Context: Fashion show with historical styles, models in related outfits.

Step 2: Options: Antiquated (outdated), Banal (common), Ancient (very old), Archaic

(old-fashioned), Apocryphal (doubtful); Arrayed (arranged), Placated (soothed), Feigned

(pretended), Garbed (clothed), Eulogized (praised); Abated (reduced), Appropriated

(took), Castigated (scolded), Alluded (referred), Impugned (challenged).

Step 3: Archaic (old-style) styles, Garbed (dressed) in outfits Alluded (hinted) to historical items.

Step 4: Others mismatch style, dressing, or reference. Quick Tip: Match old styles, dressing, and historical hints.

Step 1: Context: Passage corrects the misconception of plain white Greek art.

Step 2: It traces this error to weathered ruins, scholarly resistance, and later proof of colors.

Step 3: (e) captures the central theme of debunking the white marble myth.

Step 4: Others (a-d) misrepresent or contradict the passage’s focus. Quick Tip: Identify the core correction of a misconception.

Step 1: Context: Passage argues against the white marble misconception, tracing it to historical errors and supporting color use with evidence.

Step 2: Focus is on correcting perception with scientific proof.

Step 3: (d) summarizes the argument’s core: recognizing Greek art’s colorful nature.

Step 4: Others (a, b, c, e) misstate or overgeneralize the argument. Quick Tip: Identify the corrected perception as the argument’s focus.

Step 1: Context: "Eminent scholars... refused to countenance that pure white marble was not antiquity’s aesthetic paradigm."

Step 2: "Refused to countenance" implies rejection of accepting the color evidence.

Step 3: (b) "to understand and acknowledge" fits, as countenance means to accept or tolerate.

Step 4: Others (a, c, d, e) suggest opposing or unrelated meanings. Quick Tip: Match refusal with acceptance meaning.

Step 1: Context: Passage blames Enlightenment-era classicists for seeing weathered ruins, leading to the white marble misconception.

Step 2: Their role is to explain the origin of the error.

Step 3: (c) fits as it highlights their contribution to the misunderstanding.

Step 4: Others (a, b, d, e) misalign with the author’s intent. Quick Tip: Identify the source of the misconception.

Step 1: Context: "Refused to countenance that pure white marble was not antiquity’s aesthetic paradigm."

Step 2: "Paradigm" follows "aesthetic," suggesting a standard or model.

Step 3: (a) "model or archetype" fits, as paradigm means a typical example or pattern.

Step 4: Others (b, c, d, e) don’t align with the intended meaning. Quick Tip: Match standard or model to context.

Step 1: Context: Passage notes Enlightenment-era classicists’ influence and scholars’ resistance to color evidence, implying Greek art’s historical impact.

Step 2: Focus on classicists’ role suggests Greek art shaped later perceptions.

Step 3: (e) infers influence from their prominence in art history debates.

Step 4: Others (a-d) lack evidence or contradict the text. Quick Tip: Infer influence from historical engagement.

Step 1: Context: Passage credits late 20th-21st century scientific tests with proving Greek art’s polychrome nature, shifting understanding.

Step 2: Tests are key to overcoming past misconceptions.

Step 3: (b) reflects the author’s positive view of tests as a means to new insights.

Step 4: Others (a, c, d, e) contradict or overstate the text’s stance. Quick Tip: Identify the role of tests in new insights.

Step 1: Context: Passage highlights Greek art’s colorful vibrancy, challenging the plain white misconception, and its historical significance.

Step 2: Author emphasizes art’s quality through color use and cultural impact.

Step 3: (b) contradicts this, as the author implies Greek art’s impressiveness via its original form.

Step 4: Others (a, c, d, e) align with or are supported by the passage. Quick Tip: Identify the statement opposing the author’s view.

Step 1: Context: Passage states Enlightenment-era classicists were "the ancient Greeks’ biggest proponents," visiting ruins eagerly.

Step 2: Their actions suggest admiration, though misinterpreting colors.

Step 3: (e) infers affection from their promotion and interest.

Step 4: Others (a-d) lack evidence or contradict their role. Quick Tip: Infer admiration from their proactive interest.

Step 1: Context: Implied passage likely discusses a painter’s ability to improve nature via study.

Step 2: Options suggest a debate on natural talent versus learned skill.

Step 3: (e) aligns with an argument that study enables enhancement of nature’s flaws.

Step 4: Others (a-d) contradict or oppose this improvement-through-study theme. Quick Tip: Identify the emphasis on study improving nature.