Delhi University Law faculty review

The curriculum is very much practical knowledge based and helps the students to grow there legal reasoning which helps them to prosper in the profession. Also it helps them to read and correlate the real time judgements being passed, this curriculum prepares the students to understand the reasoning behind the judgements. Though the curriculum is practical knowledge based it still requires many improvements as these case are old and some of them are even overruled, also the we have to write very long answers which needs to be changed as new methods like ooen text book exams can be adopted to improving.

I have completed three internships but none of them was provided by the college. This is a drawback of the college placement cell but now they are putting efforts to improve it. The alumini network of the college is strong and helping through which the students get internships.

The campus donot provide employment to the students which is a drawback to me. The tution and examination fees per year is rs8010 which is very much affordable but as for the complete course student just have to pay rs24030/-. Although the fee is low but since the college donot have hostel the students have to live in pg or rented flats for which the rates are very high and not easy for every student cannot afford it. This issue of residence needs to be addressed asap. I myself pay a lot of money for the rent. Majorty of the students donot come from very good financial background so they just however manage the ends.

The campus life is phenomenal as there are a lot of students, this provides us a opportunity to connect with them thorough various groups and societies. The campus have a active lss, criminal law society, moot court society, which helps a student to develop in every dimension.

To apply for the course on needs to be a graduate. The entrance exam is held annually, one can easily fill the form at NTA's website once the notification is out for cuet pg. The entrance exam is doable as it is a general test with maths upto metric, english, general knowledge, reasoning and computer. Earlier there used to be a legal reasoning section but it was removed in the year 2023, which I find weird as it helped the students to have a slight idea of law and bloster there knowledge when the course starts.

The faculty to student ratio is high so it is not possible for the professor to interact with everyone in the class. The credentials of the faculty are outstanding but the approach they follow to teach varies from person to person, some of the faculty have a very good approach but there are some who just have a normal teaching methods.The students get very heavy case mate which we have to read and those also need to be updated with the new judgements. When it comes to the interaction with the teachers students don't face see it as a problem because the teachers are very much cooperative and it is very easy to get in touch with them.