Double Fertilisation is an important topic in the Biology section in MHT CET exam. Practising this topic will increase your score overall and make your conceptual grip on MHT CET exam stronger.
This article gives you a full set of MHT CET PYQs for Double Fertilisation with explanations for effective preparation. Practice of MHT CET Biology PYQs including Double Fertilisation questions regularly will improve accuracy, speed, and confidence in the MHT CET 2026 exam.
Also Read
MHT CET PYQs for Double Fertilisation with Solutions
1.
Which of the following flowers is most likely to be pollinated by birds?- A flower with a long, tubular shape and bright red color.
- A flower with a strong fragrance and white petals.
- A flower that opens only at night and emits a strong scent.
- A flower with small, inconspicuous petals and a dull color.
2.
During double fertilization in angiosperms, which of the following events occurs?- Fusion of a sperm cell with the egg cell to form a zygote, followed by fusion of another sperm cell with the polar nuclei to form endosperm.
- Fusion of a sperm cell with the egg cell to form the endosperm, followed by fusion of another sperm cell with the polar nuclei to form a zygote.
- Fusion of a sperm cell with the egg cell to form a seed, followed by fusion of another sperm cell with the polar nuclei to form endosperm.
- Fusion of a sperm cell with the polar nuclei to form the zygote, followed by fusion of another sperm cell with the egg cell to form endosperm.
3.
Which of the following is an example of an outbreeding device in plants?- Cleistogamy.
- Autogamy.
- Xenogamy.
- Geitonogamy.
4.
Assertion: Insects are important pollinators for many flowering plants. Reasoning: Insects visit flowers to obtain nectar or pollen, and in the process, they inadvertently transfer pollen from one flower to another, facilitating cross-pollination.- Both the assertion and reasoning are correct, and the reasoning correctly explains the assertion
- Both the assertion and reasoning are correct, but the reasoning does not correctly explain the assertion
- The assertion is correct, but the reasoning is incorrect
- Both the assertion and reasoning are incorrect
Comments