IIT Bombay vs Harvard — why does people say IIT is harder to get into?
it's about acceptance rates relative to applicants:
so on pure acceptance rate math for the top programs, IIT Bombay CSE is more selective than Harvard's overall admit rate.
however the comparison isn't fully apples-to-apples: Harvard selects holistically (essays, recommendations, extracurriculars) while IIT is purely exam-based. Harvard's applicant pool is global and self-selected; JEE has near-universal participation from Indian 12th-grade science students.
different systems, different difficulty types. but the math of selection ratios supports the claim.
The "IIT Bombay vs Harvard" comparison is actually one of the most interesting data-backed arguments in education, and most answers just throw numbers without the full context.
The admission statistics case:
But the comparison is apples vs oranges:
Bottom line: For a specific type of student (PCM-focused, exam-oriented), cracking IIT is genuinely as hard or harder. For a broader definition of "getting into elite education," the comparison gets complex. Both are exceptional achievements by any standard.
The nature of the admission procedure and its level of difficulty at IIT and Harvard are too vast.
IIT Bombay: To get admission here one needs to clear and score well in JEE Advance. It’s important to note that you don’t necessarily have to score well in JEE Mains; all you need to do is qualify for Advance.
Harvard University: Getting admission at Harvard requires an extremely high GPA around 3.9/4 along with a very high SAT score. Moreover, your extracurricular background should speak volumes of your talent.
Depending on your background and skills you might find getting admission at IIT Bombay harder than at Harvard. I think the below 2 points are the main reasons people have this general opinion.
So one college might be easier for you but difficult for others and vice versa. It all depends on individual capabilities.
IITs get more applications than Harvard. So, from a statistical point of view, one can argue that getting into IIT Bombay is more difficult than Harvard. The acceptance rate of IIT Bombay is 0.02%, while it's 5% for Harvard.
But comparing just the raw numbers, may not be fair. Getting into IIT Bombay is pretty straightforward if you can pull it off. You need to score well in JEE, and if you can clear the cutoff, you can get admission. While you can never be sure if you can get into Harvard or not. For admission, Harvard looks into SAT, AP, TOFEL (international students), past academic records, extra-curricular activities, projects, recommendations, interviews, workshops attended, and so on. Also, Harvard application fee is $75. Most people don’t apply, as they know they don’t have a chance of getting in. This is the reason why Harvard and other ivy league colleges have low application rates.
Shashi Tharoor has explained this very well in one of his motivational speeches. In 1975, every graduate from IIT was guaranteed scholarships at American institutions. Just getting admission at IIT was enough to prove credibility. IITs have such a reputation.
Infosys founder Sir Narayan Murthy was asked by an American reporter, what is his son going to do and where he applied. To this Narayan Murthy replied, his son has applied for IITs but in case he does not get in, he is going to Harvard.
This statement was surprising for many. Interestingly, his son didn’t get admission at IITs and went on to pursue his studies at Cornell and later at Harvard for his Ph.D.
The reason behind is that Harvard accepts 10% of the application submitted. Whereas, at IITs, only 10,000 students get selected out of 10 lakh applicants. And the acceptance rate is 0.1%.