CLAT MCQs on Judgments: CLAT Questions for Practice with Solutions

Shivam Yadav's profile photo

Shivam Yadav

Educational Content Expert | Updated on - Aug 22, 2025

The CLAT exam requires strong analytical skills, critical thinking, and careful reading, along with a clear understanding of the Judgments. This article provides a set of MCQs on Judgments to help you practice and strengthen your knowledge with the help of detailed solutions, which will support your CLAT 2026 exam preparation.

Whether you're revising the basics or testing your knowledge, these MCQs will serve as a valuable practice resource.

The CLAT 2026 exam is expected to follow a similar trend to the CLAT 2025, with a total of 120 questions for one mark, and 0.25 marks are deducted for each incorrect answer.

Also Read


CLAT MCQs on Judgments

1. A bench headed by _______ quashed allocation of 214
A

Justice H.L. Dattu, coal blocks, illegal and arbitrary

B

Justice R.M. Lodha, coal blocks, illegal and arbitrary

C

Justice T.S. Thakur, licenses, illegal and arbitrary

D

None of the above

View Solution


2. In a recent case a Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Prafulla C Pant held that the amount of maintenance to be awarded under Section 125 of CrPC cannot be restricted for the iddat period (three months) only as the inherent and fundamental principle behind Section 125. Also, it said that an order under Section 125 CrPC can be passed if a person, despite having sufficient means, neglects or refuses to maintain the wife.
A : Shamirna Farooqui v. Shahid Khan
B : Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum
C : Hamida Bano v. Abdul Rasheed
D : Abdul Kadir v. Salima

View Solution


3. Who called Indian Constitution as Quasi–Federal?
A : Austin
B : K. C. Wheare
C : H. M. Seervai
D : Jennings

View Solution


4. Supreme Court held that Preamble as amended in the case of
A Golaknath v. State of Punjab
B Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
C S.R. Bommai v. Union of India basic feature of Constitution cannot be amended
D Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

View Solution


5. Principle: Foreign judgment binds the parties and is conclusive unless it is obtained by fraud.
Facts: A obtains judgment from US court by producing fake documents.
A New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts
B Judgment can be enforced in US
C Judgment can be enforced in India
D New suit can not be filed in India on same facts

View Solution


CLAT Questions

  • 1.
    Principle: Foreign judgment binds the parties and is conclusive unless it is obtained by fraud.
    Facts: A obtains judgment from US court by producing fake documents.

      • New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts
      • Judgment can be enforced in US
      • Judgment can be enforced in India
      • New suit can not be filed in India on same facts

    • 2.
      In a recent case a Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Prafulla C Pant held that the amount of maintenance to be awarded under Section 125 of CrPC cannot be restricted for the iddat period (three months) only as the inherent and fundamental principle behind Section 125. Also, it said that an order under Section 125 CrPC can be passed if a person, despite having sufficient means, neglects or refuses to maintain the wife.

        • : Shamirna Farooqui v. Shahid Khan
        • : Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum
        • : Hamida Bano v. Abdul Rasheed
        • : Abdul Kadir v. Salima

      • 3.
        Who called Indian Constitution as Quasi–Federal?

          • : Austin
          • : K. C. Wheare
          • : H. M. Seervai
          • : Jennings

        • 4.

          A bench headed by _______ quashed allocation of 214

            • Justice H.L. Dattu, coal blocks, illegal and arbitrary

            • Justice R.M. Lodha, coal blocks, illegal and arbitrary

            • Justice T.S. Thakur, licenses, illegal and arbitrary

            • None of the above


          • 5.
            Supreme Court held that Preamble as amended in the case of

              • Golaknath v. State of Punjab
              • Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
              • S.R. Bommai v. Union of India basic feature of Constitution cannot be amended
              • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

            Fees Structure

            Structure based on different categories

            CategoriesState
            General4000
            sc3500
            pwd4000
            Others4000

            In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

            Comments


            No Comments To Show