Helpful faculty, propels students to explore and try out newer things and providing assistance in every aspect
Faculty:
There are mostly 1 faculty against 10 students. There are various experienced faculty from different field of architecture providing their individual expertise to the topic. There are many visiting faculty, who have their own parallel practices bringing in their practical understanding to students. The college also organises various seminars and workshops throughout the course which adds up to the design outcome.
In terms of exams, there are frequent jury which are conducted in a semester. In which multiple assignment and workshops are included in the marking scheme. Apart from Design jury, there are exams on multiple allied subjects like Theory of Structure,
We have a student faculty ratio of 1:10. All the faculty is all either a masters of architecture or an engineering. It is a mix of young and experienced faculty in the college.
Faculty is present for the students during and even after the college hours. Providing us with our all the necessary information and guidance.
The VESCOA provide good quality of faculties. The faculties of VESCOA are anything available for student and clear students doubt. And help them in studies and projects. They are provide hoand out notes after every lecture.
The excellent admin staff with excellent guidance.
The best teaching staff with more knowledge and master in respective subjects.
Faculty:
Faculties are excellent with more knowledge and master in their respective subjects.
The lectures are taken with extra knowledge and handouts are provided for each lecture on respective topic thought in lecture.
Supportive faculty and time management for academics
Focuses on practical learning and timly assignments
seminars and workshops by professionals are arranged
Faculty:
1:10 faculty to student ratio provides personal attention to each and every student. faculty is approachable and very supportive. Each mentor gives fair critics that helps students and encourages critical thinking.
Comments