How is the faculty at Anna University Chennai?

The Faculty to the student ration is 100. The realationship is approachable in friendly. As I done my Post graduation in part time so I dont know the faculties name they are from different universitites. Per Semester there will be 7 Exams for 3 Semester and the Final Semester will be 2 Exams and one Project work.

Faculty to student ratio is much better , because only 39 peoples in a batch. Comparatively the approaches and relationship between student and faculty was very good My favourite faculty is Mr.Hariharan whom is taking care of engineering metullargy and HVAC subject , he is a very kind person like him narmatha mam, chakravarthy sir Boobalan sir are very kind persons. Mr.Govind who has worst attitude not only me nobody liking his attitude and profession. 2 semester / year , 3 Internal Examinations per year will be conducted, exams are easy but not same book back question are given. 8 to 9 persons only not clear the examinations.

Most of all the teacher was friendly but they dont teach all the syllabus.they give seminar to student to take. I can not openly tell my staff name but they help me to clear failed paper in one day.they teach me one day very important content only to pass and i cleared that paper. College was under anna university so syllabus was touch only. Per semester 20 students get fail mark. Some student fail in sum papers and some people fails in theory paper. But to get pass mark we should study all the old question paper previous years. All the question should study.if we do this only we can pass on exams

The college maintenance a healthy faculty to student ratio of around 1:20, ensuring that individual attention is possible during lecture and lab session. Most faculty members are approachable and willing to guide students both academically and in career related matters

the faculty at my college were knowledable, approchable and maintained a good faculty to student ratioo, which made it easy to seek guidance. some professors were particularly supportive in clarifying concepts and guiding us in projects, thougha few relied too much on theory. The course structure followed a semester system with both internal and external assessments,and the marking scheme balanced continous evalution with final exams