How is the faculty at MIT-WPU?

Faculties doesn't have any practical knowledge. This semester there's a course called Digital Forensics. In the 1st lecture the faculty told that she is teaching the specific course for the first time and learning it as well. The program co-ordinators are very greedy as well. They just care about their professional profile.They just want to get accredited in government portals by forcing students to enroll in the specific course and select the faculty as mentor. Very hard to find good faculty. You will find good faculty once a year. There are only 2 exams-Midsems and End Sem. Midsem goes smooth while Endsem are random. They give 4-5days study leave between exams and 20days leave before the exams start. And the backlog examinations are placed randomly-some are before the endsems and some are after. They dont check the papers properly. Fail students intentionally. And every year the student portal gets changed. I am in Third year and this is my 4-5th student portal. It either gets hacked or the college doesnt pay the software contractor and they cutoff the portal.

course structure is good neutral to cover and teacher also help in those cases boys are more the girls as compare to girls the ratio is 2:1 boys:girls palash bairagi is worst teascher for me its not good for teaching exams are offline and handwritten with mid sem and end sem

The faculty are supportive,they are always bothered if students get the topic or not.They are not like compliting the topic and leaving class.There is only one faculty in a class. Dr Vaishali Gaikwad is a great teacher.She is a phd in inorganic chemistry.She has 17+yrs of experience and is faslty able to relate with the students consequences and resolves the doubt immediatly.She teaches Engineering Chemistry. Dr Sumant Shinde teaches Engineering Mechanics.He though is a good physics teacher having 20+yrs of experience and knows physics well but his method of teaching doesnt make the class interactive and students often get bored. As this is a autonomous college.It decides its syllabus by its own.Also the exam papers are also set by the internal faculty members.So scoring is not too difficult.Student generally dont fail except some exceptions.Coures are industry relevant but some courses in first year like the workshop i dont feel is relevant.

The faculties are also good and expect the best output from us. The course is vast though its divided correctly, The theory marks are 40 and remaining 60 are for assignments, attendance, tests, projects and presentations.

Faculty member are good because they genuinely respect them alot but if they start arguments withtudent they don't listen to them and the course structure is I think from the sppu under I don,t know exact course structure but yes it is like sppu others University