IITs are for those who are on the lookout for jobs and have little or no interest in research work. IISc on the other hand primarily focuses on research work. 

Basically, to pursue a career in any branch of engineering, the industry-oriented Bachelor's program offered at IITs is perfect. But for a research enthusiast who is keen to pursue a career in research, IISc is the best option.

Ultimately, the better institute is one that aligns with your preferences and area of interest.

For better reference, I have compared the IISc placement statistics with the topmost IIT Bombay

You can clearly see that IIT Bombay offers much better job opportunities than IISc.

It actually depends on your degree. For bachelor's courses, IIT Bombay is a better choice. IISc started delivering UG courses recently. But for PG courses like M.Tech or Ph.D. IISc is definitely the better option.

B.Tech is the most valued course at IIT Bombay. It gives the UG student a sense of superiority. While each department of IISc has a limited number of PG and Ph.D. students. The building and resources are completely separate for UG and PG students. 

The student-professor ratio of IISc is around 7-8 students per professor. While it is around 25-30 students per professor at IIT Bombay. 

IISc MTech branches have a better placement record as well. Good placement opportunities, multidisciplinary approach, research focus, are some of the perks of joining IISc. 

I feel I am the right person to answer this as my brother and a friend are in VIT and KIIT respectively. From what I heard from them, I derived the following conclusions 

• KIIT Campus is huge and you can find posters of Mr Achyuta Samanta at every corner of the campus. It looked more like an advertisement.
• The campus has a good location and enjoys the advantages of Bhubaneswar city.
• However, you will find very less diversity here as most of the engineering students are from East Indians. 
• The hostel rooms are spacious and well-ventilated. The overall campus is clean and beautiful with decent facilities

My friend at VIT also experienced a similar situation as both are private colleges striving to attract students. 

If ever you are left with these two choices, I suggest you go for VIT as it has better placements and ranking.

Here are a few factors to consider while comparing NIT Surathkal and DTU. 

• Alumni network: NIT Surathkal has a better alumni pool and also has better harmony than NSIT and DTU alumni. 
• Startup culture: Located in close proximity to Bangalore, NIT Surathkal has a rich startup culture A few startups that were given birth by NIT Surathkal students are Nestaway, Practo, BHIVE, Taxiforsure, Quest software, etc. DTU also encourages entrepreneurship given the fact that it has given to startups like Father of Pentium and PayTM.
• Location: NSIT is located in the heart of the capital city and enjoys maximum location benefits like connectivity to IGI Airport, Dwarka, and Gurgaon. DTU also has a great location and NIT Surathkal has the benefit of Bangalore access. 
• Brand name: The increasing number of NITs in every corner of the country has diluted the brand value to a great extent. This is not the case with DTU and NSIT who have been able to maintain their uniqueness and thus enjoy better brand names.

In all, all the 3 institutes you mentioned are prestigious institutes that will offer a plethora of opportunities in shaping your career. What matters is how well you grab the opportunities and climb the success ladder. 

You should choose SSCBS. 

• It has a strict admission procedure. Even students from reserved categories need to perform well in GD and PI to get admission. So, the student crowd of the institute is great. 
• It maintained a good placement record over the year. According to the recent highlights of SSCBS placements, students received an average CTC of INR 9.26 LPA. 
• It has one of the best campuses in Delhi. 

SSCBS offers good academics, placements, and an enviable campus experience. 

IIIT Hyderabad strongly focuses on CS and it’s known for its excellent coding culture while BITS Pilani focuses equally on a variety of specializations. At IIIT Hyderabad students are introduced to CS subjects right from the first semester while in BITS Pilani the first semester comprises subjects from various disciplines.

As for placements here is a detailed comparison:

IIIT Hyderabad has a smaller Campus compared to BITS PILANI and also has fewer facilities than BITS. Also, IIIT Hyderabad does not have a very happening campus life, and extracurricular activities are rarely given importance. BITS Pilani on the other hand has many cultural and sports events. 

It’s better to look beyond placements and look at the bigger picture. That being said, IIIT Hyderabad is a good choice if your passion is coding while if you want a good college life and want to develop your personality as a whole, BITS Pilani will serve you best. 

It’s highly illogical to compare a well-recognized brand like ISB with a no-name institute like IBS. It seems you are a bit confused between the 2 schools because comparing them is a literal joke. 

ISB is ranked 1st in India and 4th in Asia and 32nd in the World at Best B Schools. It’s a B School that competes with top B schools like IIM ABC and here you are comparing it with a C grade B school in the country. 

Almost anyone can get into IBS owing to the low qualifying scores needed and high number of seats available. Whereas getting into ISB is difficult even with a GMAT score as high as 99 percentile. ISB has the best corporate relations team in India and they work hard to get the roles that you want in the corporate sector.

The two colleges may share the same alphabet in their acronyms but there are nowhere similar when it comes to the brand name and worth.

Usually, people consider IIM ABC better than FMS. Some parameters on the basis of which people usually compare these colleges are

• Brand value: The top three IIMs ABC have more brand value than FMS. But the brand value is valuable only in the short run. After a few years, your achievements and results will determine you not your college brand value.
• Infrastructure: All the 3 IIMs have the upper hand in infrastructure and FMS is not even near them. The IIMs boast excellent hostels, huge open spaces, and state-of-the-art auditoriums. Whereas FMS has one seminar hall, two large lecture halls, 8-10 classrooms, a small canteen, and a small lawn. But great infrastructure is not a prerequisite for great management education.
• ROI: The fees at FMS is very low in comparison to other IIMs. You can easily pursue an MBA without a student loan. So whatever package you are offered is more than enough. Whereas the fees at IIMs are extremely high and require heavy student loans. So you graduate with a monthly EMI of 40k for 5 years or so. Even with a higher placement than FMS, the ROI is not comparable.

• Alumni network: If you check the list of FMS alumni, you will find it is very much comparable to the top IIMs.

• Faculty: The faculty of FMS is equally good if not better than other IIMs. FMS is more about experiential learning. Apart from a strong focus on academic and theoretical learning, there is a focus is on live projects, industry interactions, and corporate competitions. All this leads to the overall development of the students. So we can say the faculty and teaching are at par with IIMs.

• Campus life: The infrastructure, hostel facilities, and beauty of campus make the campus life of IIM students better than that of FMS which is a residential college.

• Placements: The batch size at FMS is almost half of IIMs. So the competition is also less. But the major consulting companies that visit FMS offer very few roles in comparison to IIMs. 

You can use these parameters to decide which is a better B School for you.