AIBE 2025 Question Papers with Answer Key and Detailed Solution, Download Free PDFs

AIBE 2025 Questions

• 1.

  In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the rule of nemo judex in causa sua is subject to the doctrine of necessity?

  • Sahni Silk Mills (P) Ltd. v. Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, (1994) 5 SCC 346
  • In Re: Delhi Laws Act, AIR 1951 SC 332
  • J. Mohapatra \& Co. v. State of Orissa, (1984) 4 SCC 103
  • Union of India v. G. Ganayutham, (1997) 7 SCC 463
  View Solution

  ---

• 2.

  According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?

  • Twenty-five thousand rupees
  • Fifty thousand rupees
  • One lakh rupees
  • Seventy-five thousand rupees
  View Solution

  ---

• 3.

  The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
  I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
  II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
  III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
  IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
  Select the correct answer.

  • III and IV
  • I and II
  • I, II, III and IV
  • None of these
  View Solution

  ---

• 4.

  Statement 1: Under the Indian Penal Code, if a person harbours an offender who has escaped custody for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years, he shall be punished with imprisonment up to 7 years.
  Statement 2: The law provides an exception for harbouring or concealing by the husband or wife of the offender.

  • Both Statements 1 and 2 are false
  • Only Statement 1 is true
  • Only Statement 2 is true
  • Both the Statements are true
  View Solution

  ---

• 5.

  A Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II.
  Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the Government credits ₹15,000 to the Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom fine has been recovered from the employer. This amount may be deposited or invested, and the interest is also payable to the child or adolescent.
  Conclusions:
  I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it.
  II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer.
  Which one is correct?

  • Only Conclusion I follows
  • Only Conclusion II follows
  • Both Conclusions I and II follow
  • Neither Conclusion I nor II follows
  View Solution