ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills section carried 60 questions split across two 30-question sessions, with an overall moderate difficulty level and a recommended good-attempt range of 22–26 questions per session.
AIMS conducted the ATMA July 2026 exam on July 13, 2026. The Quantitative Skills (QS) section appeared twice in the paper — as Section 2 and Section 5 — each carrying 30 questions for a combined total of 60 QS questions. Topics from Arithmetic and Data Interpretation dominated both sessions, consistent with previous ATMA July trends. Students found Section 2 more approachable, while Section 5 introduced longer DI sets and multi-step problems.
- Exam date: July 13, 2026
- QS section positions: Section 2 and Section 5 (30 questions each)
- Total QS questions: 60
- Overall difficulty: Moderate
- Good attempts per session: 22–26 out of 30
- Marking scheme: +1 for correct, –0.25 for incorrect
| Direct Link to ATMA July 2026 Official Website (ACTIVE) |
ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills Section Overview
The Quantitative Skills section tests your ability to apply mathematical concepts under time pressure. Each session allowed 30 minutes for 30 questions — one minute per question. The two QS sessions (Section 2 and Section 5) covered similar topic areas but varied in question framing and computational load. Section 5 was notably heavier on multi-step calculations and DI interpretation.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Exam name | ATMA July 2026 |
| Exam date | July 13, 2026 |
| QS section positions | Section 2 and Section 5 |
| Questions per session | 30 |
| Total QS questions | 60 |
| Time per session | 30 minutes |
| Marks per correct answer | +1 |
| Negative marking | –0.25 per wrong answer |
| Overall difficulty | Moderate |
ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills Difficulty Level
Based on student feedback gathered after ATMA July 2026, the Quantitative Skills section recorded an overall moderate difficulty level. Section 2 (the first QS session) was easy to moderate, with straightforward Arithmetic and Number System questions that rewarded fast calculation. Section 5 (the second QS session) was moderate to difficult, featuring longer Data Interpretation sets and multi-step Algebra problems that demanded more time per question.
| Session | Difficulty Level | Key Observation |
|---|---|---|
| Section 2 (QS – 1st session) | Easy to Moderate | Arithmetic-heavy; quicker, single-step calculations |
| Section 5 (QS – 2nd session) | Moderate to Difficult | Longer DI sets; multi-step Algebra problems |
| Combined QS (both sessions) | Moderate | Balanced overall; time management was the key differentiator |
Students who practised ATMA previous year papers found the calculation-intensive questions in Section 5 more time-consuming than in typical mock tests. However, accuracy remained manageable for well-prepared students who prioritised Arithmetic and Number Systems first.
ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills Chapter-Wise Question Distribution
Arithmetic dominated both QS sessions, contributing nearly 35–40% of total questions. Data Interpretation formed the second-largest block, appearing as 2–3 DI sets across the two sessions. The distribution below is based on student reviews and is expected to closely reflect the actual paper.
| Topic / Chapter | Section 2 (approx.) | Section 5 (approx.) | Combined Total | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic (Percentages, Profit & Loss, Time & Work, Time & Distance, Averages, Ratios) | 10–12 | 9–11 | 20–22 | Easy to Moderate |
| Data Interpretation (Tables, Bar Graphs, Pie Charts) | 6–8 | 7–9 | 14–16 | Moderate |
| Algebra (Linear and Quadratic Equations) | 4–5 | 4–5 | 8–10 | Moderate |
| Geometry and Mensuration | 3–4 | 3–4 | 6–7 | Moderate to Difficult |
| Number Systems (LCM, HCF, Divisibility) | 2–3 | 2–3 | 4–5 | Easy |
| Modern Math (Permutation & Combination, Probability, Progressions) | 2–3 | 2–3 | 4–5 | Moderate to Difficult |
Key observations from the ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills chapter-wise breakdown:
- Arithmetic remained the single highest-weightage topic in both sessions and is the safest starting point.
- DI sets in Section 5 required more calculation steps compared to Section 2 sets.
- Number Systems questions were straightforward and ideal for quick, penalty-free scoring.
- Geometry and Modern Math questions were fewer in number but carried higher difficulty; attempt these only if time permits.
- Students who attempted Arithmetic and Number Systems first reported better time balance across the session.
ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills Good Attempts
A good attempt in the ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills section is 22–26 questions per session (44–50 combined out of 60), with an accuracy rate of 80% or above. Attempting more questions with lower accuracy is counterproductive given the –0.25 negative marking penalty per wrong answer.
| Session | Good Attempts | Expected Score Range | Accuracy Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section 2 (QS – 1st session) | 23–26 out of 30 | 18–22 marks | ≥ 80% |
| Section 5 (QS – 2nd session) | 20–24 out of 30 | 16–20 marks | ≥ 80% |
| Combined QS (both sessions) | 44–50 out of 60 | 34–42 marks | ≥ 80% |
Students targeting a percentile above 80 in the Quantitative Skills section should aim for a combined score of 34–42 marks. Those aiming for 90+ percentile should target 42 or more correct answers across both sessions. These benchmarks are based on previous ATMA July trends and are expected figures for 2026. The –0.25 penalty means that four wrong answers cancel one correct answer — skipping doubtful questions protects your net score.
Topic-Wise Strategy for the Next ATMA Session
If you are preparing for the next ATMA session, the ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills analysis points to a consistent blueprint. Prioritise topics by weightage and your current accuracy.
- Arithmetic — practise percentage, ratio, and profit-loss problems daily; these are the quickest marks in the QS section and appear in every session.
- Data Interpretation — practise table-based and bar-graph DI sets under a 7-minute per-set limit to match Section 5-style time pressure.
- Algebra — focus on linear equation word problems and quadratic equations; these follow predictable formats that reward formula familiarity.
- Number Systems — revise divisibility rules, LCM-HCF shortcuts, and remainders for easy, low-risk marks at the start of the session.
- Geometry and Modern Math — attempt these only if you have time remaining and are confident; an incorrect attempt costs 0.25 marks more than a skip.
- Negative marking discipline — skip any question where your confidence is below 70%; four wrong answers wipe out one correct answer.
ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills FAQs
Ques. How many Quantitative Skills questions appeared in ATMA July 2026?
Ans. ATMA July 2026 had 60 Quantitative Skills questions in total — 30 in Section 2 and 30 in Section 5, each section lasting 30 minutes.
Ques. What was the difficulty level of the ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills section?
Ans. The overall difficulty was moderate. Section 2 (1st QS session) was easy to moderate while Section 5 (2nd QS session) was moderate to difficult, with longer DI sets and multi-step Algebra problems.
Ques. What is a good attempt for ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills?
Ans. A good attempt is 22–26 questions per session (44–50 combined out of 60) with at least 80% accuracy. This is expected to fetch a combined QS score of 34–42 marks based on previous ATMA July trends.
Ques. Which topics carried the most weight in ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills?
Ans. Arithmetic (approximately 20–22 questions combined) and Data Interpretation (approximately 14–16 questions combined) were the highest-weightage topics across both QS sessions in ATMA July 2026.
Ques. What is the marking scheme for ATMA July 2026 Quantitative Skills?
Ans. Each correct answer carries +1 mark and each wrong answer carries a penalty of –0.25 marks. Unattempted questions carry no penalty, so skipping doubtful questions protects your score.
Ques. Which section was tougher — Section 2 or Section 5 in ATMA July 2026 QS?
Ans. Section 5 (the second QS session) was tougher than Section 2. It featured longer Data Interpretation sets and more multi-step calculation problems, making time management more challenging in that session.



Comments